Piloting White "Sex Education" in Black Community

If “sex sells,” was does today’s sex education do--maybe the equivalent of false advertising? It’s been over sixty years since Kinsey’s Sex Behavior in the Human Male jumped hot off the press and into the (left) hands of sex educators everywhere. Kinsey may have parted the Red Sea with his revolutionary study, but some of his “beneficiaries,” the black community, are drowning in a deluge of “enlightening” wreckage. Research guru Dr. Judith A. Reisman draws on her numerous studies for the U.S. Department of Education to highlight the disparaging effects of the Kinsey sex movement on families and communities.

Planned Parenthood’s reverential “Happy Birthday, Dr. Kinsey” photo story, concedes that Kinsey, a sexual psychopath, is their fugleman, their spiritual leader.

This June 20, 2008 birthday tribute to Al is thirteen months after Barak Obama told Planned Parenthood sexperts on July 17, 2007 that he believes in “age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools,” for kindergarteners. Why? Because it is “the right thing to do."

Well, it’s really the left thing to do, but let’s not quibble over ideological facts.

President Obama wants Planned Parenthood sexperts to train our tinniest tots about sex before they can read or think. Is he unaware that “sex scientists” initially targeted the black community to test their “age appropriate sex” programs?

The first school-based clinics were set in Washington, D.C.’s almost 80 percent black population where sex education was sold as a cure for teen pregnancy and venereal disease. The brochure; Public Schools of the District of Columbia- curriculum in health and family life education, grades K - 12, 1961-1962 states:

[Sex education] was an integral part of the curriculum of 11 pilot schools beginning in September 1958. In the Fall of 1959, the number of pilot schools was increased to 41. An additional 31 schools were added in September of 1960.

In September 1989 I interviewed Ms. Paula Barry, Supervising Director of Health and Education for the Washington, D.C. school system. Ms. Barry, a charming, coffee-colored woman of medium height was pleased to report that, "Children are given [sex] information and taught to make their own decisions. They are not told what to do."

I asked Ms. Barry, did she receive this kind of sex education from her church or her parents as a child or teen? She laughed and said of course not! Ms. Barry was sexually “reeducated” by white university elites. Teachers teach children what they themselves learned as college students.

Despite their kind intentions, since 1958, black health educators taught thousands of children the same Kinseyan sexual immorality they themselves had learned. Post 1958 the wise, healthy, productive, and protective sexual decisions black children heard from parents and church were slandered. After 1958 teachers and the sexualized media would largely shape what thousands of vulnerable schoolchildren "chose to do."

What false, injurious sexual ideas were forced on these naive teachers and their captive students in the late 50's and early 60's?

A 1969 headline in the now defunct Washington DC, Sunday Star read, "Sex Education Films Candid, Explicit." The largely black local school board voted to forbid teaching contraception or sexual intercourse to schoolchildren. The largely white, far left administration ignored the school board.

As captive students, children “3-to-10-years-old” were forced to view "explicit" films with "frank and direct" narratives on "barnyard animals mating." (These child sex education experiments recall the 1932 to 1972 U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) vicious experiment on black men in Tuskegee.)

According to the Sunday Star, by the early 1960’s DC children were watching "animated drawings” of the male ejaculation as a narrator explained. "it is nature's way of passing the sperm into the female body during sexual intercourse." Although such films might delight leftist advanced thinkers, the “uneducated” parents feared such deviant behaviors encouraged pre-marital sex, and would coarsen, excite, and shame their children. They worried that such “education” would increase sexual and social disorders, crimes, pregnancies, diseases, in their community.

The educators mocked what they saw as sexually repressed, religiously indoctrinated black parents. The white sex education establishment patiently explained that without academic degrees parents were unable to teach their children healthy sexual behavior. What sexologists called “healthy” expanded over the years to embrace children’s bi/homosexuality, transvestism, group and friend sex, mutual masturbation, pornography, and oral and anal sodomy, (suggesting that absent condoms try plastic wrap. One child asked me if tin foil was approved.)

Ah, such smart folks training our young in the tender art of wooing, love and devotion.

Remember, there was no sex profession (except prostitution) until Indiana University’s Professor Kinsey released Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). So, the western world would henceforth drop Biblical repressions and copy the sexual practices of a sadosexual, bi/homosexual masturbation and pornography addict who employed pedophiles to sodomize at least 317 (apparently black) little boys.

Children learned the new sexuality from freshly minted sex teachers in 1958.

In it’s glowing “Happy Birthday, Dr. Kinsey” tribute, PP confirms that Kinsey’s “sex reports electrified” the world “in the late 1940s and '50s.” Kinsey exposed “hypocrisy about all things sexual [and] demonstrated unheard-of truths including:”

1. “women and men masturbate
2. women and men have sex before marriage and outside of marriage
3. women and men enjoy oral and/or anal sex play
4. women experience orgasm by clitoral stimulation
5. many, many women and men have same-sex sexual fantasies and experiences”

Wow! What are they smoking! “Unheard of truths?!” Indeed, the Bible was candid about (1) masturbation. The unheard of truth is that Kinsey, a sado masturbation addict, appears to have died of “orchitis,” a disease commonly associated with trauma to ones sex organs (also associated with venereal disease). Is Kinsey’s orchitis infection part of the PP sex ed curricula?



The Bible also “unveiled” (2) sex before marriage (fornication) and outside of marriage (adultery). (3) “Oral and/or anal sex” were called “sodomy,” and western laws largely protected women and children from such mainly homosexual “play,” the latter especially linked to myriad emotional and physical harms (see AIDS). Note, Kinsey’s tiny sodomized “orgasm” victims screamed, cried and begged for relief from his team’s “play,” shown here on Table 34, page 180 of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948). Their rescuers never arrived. Instead, PP says Kinsey “sped our way to understanding a core belief that we hold dearly [sic] today.”

In 1958 the white elites saw black parents as failures instead of self sufficient, productive, religiously schooled members of society. Soon, millions of white parents would also be intimidated into accepting sexpert claims of higher scientific knowledge.

Yet, the results of their post 1958 sex education are well documented. December 6, 2008 The Washington Post reported that “in 1950, at the height of the Jim Crow era and despite the shattering legacy of slavery, the great majority of black children -- an estimated 85 percent -- were born to their two married parents… Today, 70 percent of black children are born to single mothers.”

Today, schoolchildren “Pin the Condom on the Penis” and Put the Condom on the Cucumber. What fun! Such schoolroom “sex science” is designed to ridicule any old-fashioned Judeo-Christian modesty a child may harbor that inhibits unrestrained sex “play.” (http://www.thelancetstudent.com/2009/01/13/a-course-in-condoms-cucumbers).

Neuroscience now confirms what most sensible parents always knew, one seldom comprehends the complexities and consequences of sex until adulthood. The prefrontal cortex, "the area of sober second thought” that controls impulses and good judgment, the CEO of the brain, is not fully mature until ones mid 20s. Hence, any justification or stimulation of youthful sex is harmful on its face.

Sex educators deserve major credit for how children have “expressed their sexuality” since the late 1960s. It is currently expressed in pandemic sexually transmitted diseases, “illegitimate” births (despite contraception and legal abortions) sexual harassment, date rape, illicit drug, alcohol, and pornography addictions, and growing bisexual, homosexual and transvestite experimentation.

Ah, the afterglow of sex science!

Obviously fraudulent sexologists are not the lone villains for marital destruction and sexual promiscuity. White pornography (Playboy) also hit the black community in December 1953 and the welfare state was right behind.

Since 1958 the sex educators' trampling over parental wisdom has "worked." Today Washington, D.C. has the nation's highest rate of single parent households in the country with a natural yield of crime, despair, and cynicism that black parents feared would result from sex "education" in 1958!

Our prior generations, lacking doctorates, and “sex science” education, built a nation, won wars, and made love without legal abortion, contraception, and still without epidemic venereal diseases and “illegitimacy.”

Despite the massive evidence of the failure of sex education, organized sex educators condemn chastity and push “age appropriate” “sexually explicit” images, films, books and the like for all schoolchildren.

They dare not answer the simple question; following six decades teaching its “core belief” to millions of children, are families, women, or children healthier, safer before or after Kinseyan PP sex education?

The answer? How long has it been since children played alone in our playgrounds in the day and since women strolled alone in our parks at night?

For more info ...

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/issues-action/other/articles/happy-birthday-dr-kinsey-21171.htm, February 21, 2009.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/05/AR2008120503088_pf.html
, February 19, 2009.


 

Digg This
Print
Email
Add a Comment
0

Leave a Reply

You are not logged in. Please login to leave a reply.